Project

i.WET – integrated Water-Energy Transition Concept

i.WET is a practical concept for heat and water reuse that promotes a nature-based urban water cycle and is characterized by an improved energy balance compared to conventional water infrastructure. It was developed at Fraunhofer ISI as part of the BMBF research project TWIST++.

How the i.WET concept works

In the i.WET concept, low-contaminated partial flows such as graywater and stormwater are decoupled from municipal wastewater. These partial flows can be used for heat recovery to increase energy efficiency and/or reused for other purposes within the household, depending on the level of contamination and the treatment required. Water that is not reused in the household flows into the so-called “Energy Alley“ – a green strip designed as a soil filter that can also serve as roadside greenery and absorb street runoff.

In this way, i.WET promotes a near-natural urban water cycle, serves as a barrier against nutrients and pollutants, improves resource efficiency, and provides additional ecosystem services enhancing the urban landscape.

Funktionsweise des i.WET-Konzepts
© Fraunhofer ISI
Principle of the i.WET concept
  • The path toward sustainable and resilient cities requires new approaches on many levels, including infrastructure design and provision. Infrastructure secures a society’s basic services and directly shape resource consumption, environmental quality, and thus quality of life. Due to major transformation processes such as climate change, demographic shifts, and technological and social change, infrastructure systems face substantial demands for adaptation. This translates into significant technical and economic challenges, particularly for pipe-bound, long-lasting systems such as water infrastructure.

    Water infrastructure in German cities faces major challenges: Climate change is leading to more extreme rainfall events and altered precipitation patterns; demographic change is resulting in a different population structure; and increasing scarcity of raw materials is creating a need to improve resource efficiency. Water infrastructure must be adapted to these new conditions.

    The transition of water infrastructure toward resilient, resource-efficient systems – capable of responding more flexibly to adaptation needs – requires concepts that can be gradually integrated into the existing infrastructure. Furthermore, these concepts must be able to function as hybrids alongside conventional system components – whether such components are retained or adapted – while reliably fulfilling all required functions.

  • In response to the challenges described (climate change, demographic change, and technological and societal change), Fraunhofer ISI developed the i.WET concept (integrated water-energy transition concept) as part of the BMBF research project TWIST++. The key innovation of this approach lies in the combination of two complementary water reuse pathways into a practical, holistic concept characterized by high sustainability and flexibility.

    i.WET is based on the selective separation of low-contaminated partial flows from municipal wastewater – graywater, stormwater, and, where applicable, street runoff – before these streams are mixed together. This separate treatment enables optimized, demand-based processing while keeping effort to a minimum.

  • Blauer Wiederverwertungsweg für Wasser laut i.WET-Konzept
    © Fraunhofer ISI
    Blue water reuse pathway according to the i.WET concept

    The “blue“ reuse pathway combines proven individual technologies – such as rainwater harvesting, graywater recycling, and heat recovery from graywater – that have, however, seen little application in municipal contexts to date. This combination ensures a continuous supply of service water and thermal energy.

  • Grüner Wiederverwertungsweg für Wasser laut i.WET-Konzept
    © Fraunhofer ISI, Shutterstock.com/Elena Elisseeva
    Green water reuse pathway according to the i.WET concept

    The “green“ pathway uses nature-based modules to functionally integrate the urban landscape as “green infrastructure“. The central element is the so-called Energy or i.WET Alley, a combination of a vegetated soil filter and a drainage element. The i.WET Alley consists of a multi-layered soil structure that is sealed at the bottom. Excess stormwater and rainwater, as well as street runoff, are distributed (underground) across the surface and directed vertically through the soil filter body. The filtration effect, complemented by sorption and transformation processes in the biofilms, enables substantial removal of pollutants, nutrients, and pathogens.

    Additional functions of the i.WET Alley may include: retention of hydraulic peaks during heavy rainfall events, a cooling effect in urban neighborhoods through increased evapotranspiration, biomass production, and the provision of ecosystem services.

    Due to their high design flexibility, i.WET Alleys can be arranged along streets, at property boundaries, or as design elements within green spaces. They thus integrate seamlessly into a wide range of urban contexts and enable multifunctional use of existing land. A conceptual illustration is provided below.

  • The strength of the i.WET concept lies not in the individual technologies, but in their intelligent interconnection:

    • Rainwater and treated graywater complement each other to provide a year-round, reliable industrial water supply.
    • Excess service water and unused graywater are treated via the i.WET Alley and simultaneously used for irrigation and cooling.
    • Thermal and material resource recovery are integrated: heat is recovered from graywater prior to treatment, and nutrients are recovered through biomass production.
    • The system functions as a multifunctional barrier: hygienic safety is ensured through multi-stage treatment, while pollutant removal occurs both technically (membrane filtration, UV disinfection) and nature-based (soil filters).
  • A key feature of i.WET is its potential for gradual implementation, aligned with the long renovation cycles of pipe-bound infrastructure systems:

    • First transition step (20–40 years): i.WET components are gradually integrated during building renovations – initially rainwater harvesting and, where applicable, graywater recycling. Residual domestic wastewater (blackwater and unused graywater) continues to be discharged to the wastewater treatment plant via the existing sewer system. Water reuse within buildings reduces wastewater volumes by approximately 30 percent, resulting in a more concentrated effluent.
    • Second transition step (60–80 years): As the first step becomes increasingly more widespread, wastewater volumes in the sewer decline to the point where the shear stress required for adequate solids transport under gravity flow can no longer be guaranteed. This opens a “window of opportunity“ for the gradual conversion to a vacuum sewer system, which can operate reliably with significantly lower water volumes.
    • Third transition phase (15–50 years): The concentrated residual wastewater collected from multiple neighborhoods enables long-term efficiency gains at the wastewater treatment plant. Smaller, highly concentrated wastewater streams can be treated with greater efficiency and lower specific energy consumption. In addition, nutrient recovery (phosphorus, nitrogen) can be carried out more cost-effectively at higher concentrations.

    This three-stage strategy avoids lock-in effects and enables adaptive infrastructure development without abrupt system changes. Importantly, i.WET can also be implemented as a standalone solution in existing neighborhoods without necessarily progressing through all three transition steps.

  • The innovative combination of the “blue“ and “green“ reuse pathways creates a practical, sustainable, and flexible comprehensive concept that delivers positive effects across all three dimensions of sustainability:

    • Ecological: Reduction of drinking water consumption by up to 40 percent, reduction of wastewater volume and load, reduced pollutant loads to receiving waters through fewer combined sewer overflows, enhancement of the natural water cycle through increased evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge, mitigation of the urban heat island effect, and promotion of biodiversity.
    • Economic: Life-cycle costs comparable to conventional drainage systems (combined sewer systems) and significantly lower than those of separate sewer systems; savings through reduced potable water consumption and lower wastewater fees; lower investment costs by avoiding oversized drainage infrastructure; and development of new value chains (bioenergy, irrigation services).
    • Social: Improved urban quality of life through green infrastructure; increased resilience to extreme weather events (heat, heavy rainfall); visible improvement of the residential environment; opportunities for resident participation through transparent systems; and creation of innovative jobs and new roles for municipal stakeholders.

    The i.WET concept thus represents an integrative, multifunctional approach that combines technological innovation with nature-based elements to sustainably address the complex challenges of urban water infrastructure.

    • i.WET Lünen: In the city of Lünen, North Rhine-Westphalia, the concept is being applied in a demonstration project in which i.WET is integrated into a new residential complex in the “Coers-Fläche“ demonstration site. The construction and implementation phases were scientifically monitored.
    • TWIST++: For three model areas, new concepts for adapting water infrastructure to future challenges and a planning support system were developed. i.WET was designed to planning maturity within this framework.
    • WaRM (in German): An integrated water system model for the Frankfurt/Rhine-Main metropolitan region was developed to reduce use conflicts over scarce water resources and to ensure measures for sustainable water supply. Key areas of intervention also include measures in the urban context, incorporating innovative water infrastructure concepts.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Lesmeister, L.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Tettenborn, F. (2026): Innovative Wasser-Energie-Transition (i.WET): Demonstrationsvorhaben in Lünen. Umsetzung eines innovativen Konzepts als Transitionsschritt hin zu einer zukunftsfähigen Wasserinfrastruktur. Abschlussbericht. Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung ISI, Karlsruhe.
    • Hohmann, C.; Bieker, S.; Truffer, B. (2025): Breaking out of the silo: collaborative approaches to implementing blue-green infrastructure in urban areas. Blue-Green Systems 7 (1), pp. 95–109.
    • Hohmann, C.; Bieker, S. (2024): Nachhaltigkeitstransformation der urbanen Infrastruktur in Deutschland. Das Infrastructure-Transition-Canvas als Hilfsmittel für die Klimafolgenanpassung durch blau-grüne Infrastrukturen in der Stadtentwässerung. In: Kreutz, S.; Stokman, A. (Eds.): Transformation urbaner linearer Infrastrukturlandschaften. Wie Straßen und Gewässer zu attraktiven und klimaangepassten Stadträumen werden können. oekom Verlag, pp. 51–64. DOI: 10.24406/publica-2766.
    • Hohmann, C.; Bieker, S. (2023): Klimaanpassung mittels blaugrüner Infrastrukturen. Beschleunigung von Nachhaltigkeitstransformationen mit dem Infrastructure-Transition-Canvas (ITC). Transforming cities 3, pp. 71–75.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J. (2023): Wasserressourcenmanagement in Zeiten des Klimawandels. wwt Wasserwirtschaft Wassertechnik (07–08/2023).
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J. (2022): Konkrete Umsetzung innovativer Konzepte – Akteure, Organisation, rechtlicher Rahmen. Seminar: Wasserbewusste Stadtentwicklung durch ressourcenorientierte Sanitärsysteme (NASS), 29. März 2022, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA), Hennef.
    • Hillenbrand, T. (2022): Kopplung von Wasser- und Energieströmen – Umsetzung des i.WET-Konzepts in Lünen. Seminar: Ressourcenorientierte Sanitärsysteme (NASS) – Wasserknappheit in der Stadt, 19. Januar 2022, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V. (DWA), Hennef.
    • Hohmann, C.; Truffer, B. (2022): The infrastructure transition canvas: A tool for strategic urban infrastructure planning. Nature-Based Solutions 2, 100039. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100039.
    • Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Winkler, J.; Fritz, M.; Zheng, L.; Hillenbrand, T.; Kolisch, G.; Schirmer, G.; Borger, J.; Doderer, H.; Dörrfuß, I. (2021): Klimaschutz- und Energieeffizienzpotenziale in der Abwasserwirtschaft – aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. UBA-Texte 50/2021, Dessau.
    • Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Hillenbrand, T. (2020): Von der Siedlungsentwässerung zum Wassermanagement – Transition am Beispiel eines Stadtquartiers. fbr-Wasserspiegel 04/20, pp. 3–8.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Hohmann, C.; Bieker, S.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Tettenborn, F.; Grimm, A. (2019): Kopplung technischer Infrastruktursysteme am Beispiel Wasser. Potenziale, Hemmnisse und deren Überwindung. Transforming cities 4 (4), pp. 75–79.
    • Sartorius, C.; Hillenbrand, T.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J. (2019): Multikriterielle Bewertung von Wasserinfrastruktursystemen im Kontext der SDGs. In: Leal Filho, W. (Hrsg.): Aktuelle Ansätze zur Umsetzung der UN-Nachhaltigkeitsziele. Springer Spektrum, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 271–289. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-58717-1_15.
    • Sartorius, C.; Lévai, P.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Nyga, I.; Sorge, C.; Hillenbrand, T. (2018): Comparative multi-criteria performance assessment of alternative water infrastructure systems. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 18 (6), pp. 2188–2198. DOI: 10.2166/ws.2018.045.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Bieker, S.; Dockhorn, T.; Felmeden, J.; Kaufmann Alves, I.; Langergraber, G.; Lautenschläger, S.; Maurer, M.; Neuhausen, S.; Steinmetz, H. (2018): Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Wasserinfrastruktursystemen – Leitfaden zur Anwendung des Arbeitsblatts DWA-A 272. KA Korrespondenz Abwasser, Abfall 65 (5), pp. 443–449.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Eckartz, K.; Hiessl, H.; Hohmann, C.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J. (2018): Transition urbaner Wasserinfrastruktursysteme – notwendig und machbar? KA Korrespondenz Abwasser, Abfall 65 (2), pp. 121–129. DOI: 10.3242/kae2018.02.003.
    • Söbke, H.; Hofmann, A. F.; Kropp, I.; Miethke, A.; Schwarz, D.; Hillenbrand, T.; Londong, J. (2018): Software-TWISTing: Integrierte Systeme für die Planung zukunftsfähiger kommunaler Wasserinfrastruktur. KA Korrespondenz Abwasser, Abfall 65 (1), pp. 39–45. DOI: 10.3242/kae2018.01.003.
    • Nyga, I.; Lück, A.; Raber, W.; Hillenbrand, T.; Zimmermann, M.; Eller, M.; Eismann, C.; Möller, K.; Felmeden, J.; Langer, M.; Urban, W. J. F. (2018): Rahmenkonzepte zur integrierten Bewertung siedlungswasserwirtschaftlicher Systeme. gwf – Wasser|Abwasser 159 (1), pp. 53–62.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Hiessl, H.; Menger-Krug, E.; Maier, K.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Sorge, C.; Londong, J. (2017): Innovative Systemlösungen für unterschiedliche Randbedingungen im Bestand – Ergebnisse des Projekts TWIST++. In: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik (Difu) (Eds.): Wasserinfrastrukturen für die zukunftsfähige Stadt. Beiträge aus der INIS-Forschung. Berlin, pp. 128–133.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Menger-Krug, E.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Schratz, U. (2017): Umsetzung innovativer Wasserinfrastruktursysteme im Bestand im Zusammenspiel verschiedener Akteursgruppen. In: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik (Difu) (Eds.): Wasserinfrastrukturen für die zukunftsfähige Stadt. Beiträge aus der INIS-Forschung. Berlin, pp. 286–291.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Menger-Krug, E.; Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Sartorius, C.; von Lüninck, B. F.; Hiessl, H. (2017): Transitionswege WasserInfraSTruktursysteme: Anpassung an neue Herausforderungen im städtischen und ländlichen Raum. Endbericht.
    • Hillenbrand, T.; Londong, J.; Steinmetz, H.; Wilhelm, C.; Sorge, C.; Söbke, H.; Nyga, I.; Minke, R.; Menger-Krug, E. (2016): Anpassung an neue Herausforderungen – nachhaltige Wasserinfrastruktursysteme für Bestandsgebiete. KA Korrespondenz Abwasser, Abfall 63 (11), pp. 992–998.
    • Hiessl, H.; Hillenbrand, T. (2016): Projektbeispiel „TWIST++“ – Weiterentwicklung der Wasserinfrastruktursysteme im städtischen und ländlichen Raum. In: DStGB Dokumentation Nr. 139: Wasser, Abwasser, Energie – Übergreifende Lösungen und Modellvorhaben zur Integration der Infrastrukturen, pp. 13–14.
    • Niederste-Hollenberg, J.; Menger-Krug, E.; Feldmann, U.; Joel, E.; Hillenbrand, T. (2016): Transition von Wasserinfrastruktursystemen in Bestands- und Neuerschließungsgebieten. wwt Wasserwirtschaft Wassertechnik.
    • Menger-Krug, E. (2015): How can urban water infrastructures contribute to a sustainable urban metabolism? Trust – Cities of the Future Conference, Mülheim an der Ruhr, 28.–30. April 2015.